I have
seen the first nine episodes of "The Glee Project" and while I agree
with you that reality TV is exploitative in general, this show does serve a purpose.
For one thing, all of the kids on this show are immensely talented and
this may be the biggest, broadest exposure they ever receive in their
lives -- I expect a lot of them will be able to use the experience of
being on the show to broaden their careers and future opportunities.
Secondly, the "winner" will be written into SEVEN episodes of the show
(they state this repeatedly on the show itself). This is such a
competitive business - for actors, writers, singers, etc. - and a show
like this can really give some people an opportunity who might
otherwise have never received any recognition at all. The producers,
directors, choreographers from Glee who participate in The Glee Project
seem very respectful and sincere - and I wouldn't be surprised if
several of the kids end up making appearances on the show next season.
I was obviously wrong to assume
that the winner of the Project would win a pittance of role. A seven
episode run is a reoccurring role and more than most actors could ever
even dream of their entire careers. So, that winning the Project leads
to an actually fantastic thing really is amazing for the winner of the
show - SPOILER ALERT - or winners in this case as the
first season was won by two actors.
Zoje is probably also right to
assume that some/all of the other finalists of the Project will get some
sort of guest appearance on Glee and good on them.
However, neither the winner's
prize nor the opportunity for the non-winners justifies, in my eyes, the
exploitative nature of this programme nor it's undermining of the
actor's safety net that is the casting system.
Here's the thing, all reality TV shows are for the vast majority of the contestants the
'biggest, broadest exposure they ever receive in their lives.' And
that is exactly the issue that I have with these shows. They promise
their contestants an 'equal' chance at whatever prize, where in most
cases it has been decided from the very beginning who is going to win
the show. In some shows, like New Zealand's Next Top Model for instance,
it is blatantly obvious who will get eliminated every week. Some shows
manage to hide their agenda and be a bit more subtle. However, since the
winner is at least to a very large extent decided from the get go, all
the eliminated contestants went through the humiliation that is a
reality TV show for mostly nothing.
As we all know, on reality TV no one gets represented the way they actually are, the producers and editors decide that. The eliminated contestants' prize is the 'biggest,
broadest exposure they ever receive in their lives' but this exposure
neither represents who they truly are nor leads to bigger and better
things in the vast majority of cases. Just think how many of the by now
surely more than 100 finalists on American Idol can claim to have made a
career of the exposure they got courtesy of that show?
I
also disagree with the statement that the Glee Project 'can really give
some people an opportunity who might otherwise have never received any
recognition at all.' Since the prize of the Glee Project is a role on a
scripted TV show, the producers might just as well have held the open
casting call they held to assemble the cast of the Glee Project and left
it at that. The 12 Glee Project contestants would have had the same if
not a much fairer chance of getting that seven episode role and the bit
parts perhaps now being offered to the eliminees. They certainly would
not have had to go through the exploitation, humiliation and degradation
that is the Glee Project.
Perhaps
the producers, directors and choreographers on the Glee Project acted
'very respectful and sincere' in other parts of the programme but
forcing the contestants to reveal on national and international
syndicated TV their biggest secrets while standing around half-naked in
public was enough to do my head in. Forcing the contestants to reveal
such personal information and fears, surrounding them as being gay and
being called fake certainly doesn't do anything for the contestants or
their careers. It's simply another exploitative means for the Glee
Project's producers to make the show attractive, certainly not something
they do because they care about these kids' futures.
Yes,
exploitation is a huge part of all reality TV. It's kind of the point of
reality TV if we're being honest. The point I am making about the Glee
Project is that the Glee producers already had an open casting call for
Glee's next season that gave these 12 contestants all the chance they
needed to win a role on the scripted show. To make them jump through
extra hoops and drag them through the dishonest mud of reality TV, lying
to them about everyone having an equal chance at the big role, is
unethical - especially in a business were actors work their arses off
every day, for years and without pay and the only safety net we have is
that if we get a professional audition, we can do our job without
exploitation and humiliation, and go home with the same chance as
everyone else.
No comments:
Post a Comment